Bile leak following T-tube removal

Background and aim and objectives T-tube choledochostomy is performed following open or laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. There is increased concern regarding safety and efficiency of choledochostomy. The present paper evaluates the short-lived effectiveness and safety of T-tube bile leak a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAl-Azhar Assiut medical Journal : AAMJ Vol. 19; no. 3; pp. 469 - 476
Main Authors Shemy, Gamal, Hassan, Ahmed, Elias, Abd
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Wolters Kluwer - Medknow Publications 01.07.2021
Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background and aim and objectives T-tube choledochostomy is performed following open or laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. There is increased concern regarding safety and efficiency of choledochostomy. The present paper evaluates the short-lived effectiveness and safety of T-tube bile leak after its removal. Patients and methods A total of 86 cases of choledocholithiasis were admitted to Al-Azhar University Hospital, Assiut. They underwent cholecystectomy (open), choledochotomy, and T-tube choledochostomy. T-tube choledochography was performed 10 days after surgery, and removal of the tube was done after 12 days. Results Morbidities, mainly bile leak and peritonitis, were estimated. A total of 10 patients had evidence of radiological leak. Marked biliary reactions were noticed in six cases promptly following T-tube removal. Five of these cases had clinical peritonitis, treated conservatively. Only one patient had biliary peritonitis and required reoperation. Conclusion The operative use of T-tube choledochostomy has been in dramatical decline in the past 20 years (owing to the development and adoption of removal lesser invasive maneuvers of choledocholithiasis removal). Manipulation of T-tube (situation and extraction) is technically exigent. Intricacy and morbidity are critical; thus, it is recommended not to be performed as a routine maneuver. Easier options must be taken into account initially.
ISSN:1687-1693
2536-9652
DOI:10.4103/azmj.azmj_50_21