Mental workload vs. stress differentiation using single-channel EEG

The emergence of wearable low-cost wireless devices has allowed for continuous acquisition of physiological signals. Recently number of studies have applied these acquisition systems in different types of health monitoring. Since continuous elevation of stress hormones can have negative impact on in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCMBEBIH 2017 pp. 511 - 515
Main Authors Secerbegovic, A., Ibric, S., Nisic, J., Suljanovic, N., Mujcic, A.
Format Book Chapter
LanguageEnglish
Published Singapore Springer Singapore
SeriesIFMBE Proceedings
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The emergence of wearable low-cost wireless devices has allowed for continuous acquisition of physiological signals. Recently number of studies have applied these acquisition systems in different types of health monitoring. Since continuous elevation of stress hormones can have negative impact on individuals’ health, it is important to recognize and possibly prevent stress episodes in working environments. In this paper, we have tested if single-channel electroencephalography (EEG) signals can be utilized in assessment of different levels of mental workload and stress. Experimental study was conducted in laboratory settings with nine participants. In addition to EEG signals, we have acquired electrocardiogram (ECG) and electrodermal activity (EDA) recordings during all stages. Two scenarios are tested: first group of participants was introduced to only mental workload assignments, while second group was tested with mental workload and public speaking task as an stress inducing assignment. The experimental results show that EEG features have an acceptable separation ability between investigated states, where best classification accuracy, obtained between relaxed and high mental workload states, was 86.66%. Compared to only ECG or EDA features, EEG-based classification accuracy is higher in both scenarios, but lower in comparison with combined features from all three physiological signals.
ISBN:9811041652
9789811041655
ISSN:1680-0737
1433-9277
DOI:10.1007/978-981-10-4166-2_78