A selective review and comparison for interval variable selection in spectroscopic modeling

Dimension reduction and variable selection are two types of effective methods that deal with high-dimensional data. In particular, variable selection techniques are of wide-spread use and essentially consist of individual selection methods and interval selection methods. Given the fact that the vibr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inChemometrics and intelligent laboratory systems Vol. 172; pp. 229 - 240
Main Authors Wang, Li-Li, Lin, You-Wu, Wang, Xu-Fei, Xiao, Nan, Xu, Yuan-Da, Li, Hong-Dong, Xu, Qing-Song
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier B.V 15.01.2018
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Dimension reduction and variable selection are two types of effective methods that deal with high-dimensional data. In particular, variable selection techniques are of wide-spread use and essentially consist of individual selection methods and interval selection methods. Given the fact that the vibrational spectra have continuous features of spectral bands, interval selection instead of individual spectral wavelength point selection allows for more stable models and easier interpretation. Numerous methods have been suggested for interval selection recently. Therefore, this paper is devoted to a selective review on interval selection methods with partial least squares (PLS) as the calibration model. We described the algorithms in the five classes: classic methods, penalty-based, sampling-based, correlation-based, and projection-based methods. Finally, we compared and discussed the performances of a subset of these methods on three real-world spectroscopic datasets. •A selective review on interval selection methods with PLS as the calibration model is presented.•Five classes of interval selection methods, including classic methods, penalty-based, sampling-based, correlation-based, and projection-based methods are summarized and compared.•The performance of a subset of such interval selection methods are benchmarked and discussed on three real-world spectroscopic datasets.
ISSN:0169-7439
1873-3239
DOI:10.1016/j.chemolab.2017.11.008