Monitoring and evaluation for thinking and working politically

This article explores the challenges of monitoring and evaluating politically informed and adaptive programmes in the international development field. We assess the strengths and weaknesses of some specific evaluation methodologies which have been suggested as particularly appropriate for these kind...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEvaluation (London, England. 1995) Vol. 28; no. 1; pp. 36 - 57
Main Authors Aston, Thomas, Roche, Chris, Schaaf, Marta, Cant, Sue
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London, England SAGE Publications 01.01.2022
SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC
Subjects
Causality
Power
Uncertainty
participation
adaptive management
politics
generative methods
rigour
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:This article explores the challenges of monitoring and evaluating politically informed and adaptive programmes in the international development field. We assess the strengths and weaknesses of some specific evaluation methodologies which have been suggested as particularly appropriate for these kinds of programmes based on scholarly literature and the practical experience of the authors in using them. We suggest that those methods which assume generative causality are particularly well suited to the task. We also conclude that factoring in the politics of uncertainty and evidence generation and use is particularly important in order to recognize and value diverse experiential knowledge, integrate understandings of the local context, accommodate adaptation and realistically grapple with the power relations which are inherent in evaluation processes.
ISSN:1356-3890
1461-7153
DOI:10.1177/13563890211053028