5 kW SOFC stack via 3D printing manufacturing: An evaluation of potential environmental benefits

• Published in: Applied energy Vol. 291; p. 116803
• Main Authors: Ferreira, Victor J., Wolff, Deidre, Hornés, Aitor, Morata, Alex, Torrell, M., Tarancón, Albert, Corchero, Cristina
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier Ltd 01.06.2021
• Subjects: 3D printing; Life cycle assessment; SOFC end-of-life scenarios; Solid oxide fuel cell; Life cycle assessment; Solid oxide fuel cell; 3D printing; SOFC end-of-life scenarios
• ISSN: 0306-2619; 1872-9118
• DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.116803

•An LCA cradle-to-grave for the fabrication of a 3D printed SOFC stack is conducted.•An environmental framework for SOFC 3D stack printing manufacturing is provided.•SOFC stack produced by 3D printing process presents lower global environmental impact.•Critical factors are shown for conventional methods and 3D printed stack manufacturing. 3D printing technologies are being called on to revolutionize the manufacturing industry of the energy sector, especially when involving functional materials and complete devices. These additive manufacturing technologies show competitive advantages over conventional processes, however only a few studies have assessed their environmental implications. In this work, the environmental performance of a Solid Oxide Fuel Cell stack produced using a novel 3D printing approach is conducted for the first time using Life Cycle Assessment. In addition, a comparative study with conventional manufacturing methods is carried out. The results reveal that the production of the 3D printing materials has the highest environmental impact (between 50% and 98%) in half of the categories studied. In contrast, the end-of-life stage represents less than 1% of the total impact. End-of-life scenarios are also presented and discussed, indicating that a recycling rate of 70% for Nickel and YSZ materials performs better than the defined landfill and incineration disposal scenarios. Furthermore, 3D printing shows the best overall environmental performance compared to other conventional methods. The main improvement is seen in the material production stage, where a savings ranging from 37% to 97% (depending on the category analysed) is observed. This is mainly due to the use of a ceramic material for the interconnects instead of Chromium-based alloys used in a more conventional approach. Finally, it was observed that the energy required for 3D printing in the manufacturing stage is a sensible parameter to the environmental performance of the SOFC 3D printing technology.