Structure and conformation of thioanisole: Gas electron diffraction and contradicting quantum chemical calculations

The geometric structure and conformational properties of thioanisole, C 6H 5SCH 3, have been studied by gas-phase electron diffraction (GED) and quantum chemical calculations. The GED intensities are fitted very well with a single conformer with planar orientation of the S–CH 3 bond ( φ(C–S) = 0°)....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of molecular structure Vol. 873; no. 1; pp. 137 - 141
Main Authors Shishkov, Igor F., Khristenko, Lyudmila V., Karasev, Nikolai M., Vilkov, Lev V., Oberhammer, Heinz
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier B.V 17.02.2008
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The geometric structure and conformational properties of thioanisole, C 6H 5SCH 3, have been studied by gas-phase electron diffraction (GED) and quantum chemical calculations. The GED intensities are fitted very well with a single conformer with planar orientation of the S–CH 3 bond ( φ(C–S) = 0°). The experimental potential function for internal rotation around the C(sp 2)–S bond derived with a dynamic model possesses a single minimum for planar conformation, but a second shallow minimum for perpendicular orientation cannot be excluded. Calculated potential functions depend strongly on the computational method. The MP2 approximation with small basis sets (6-31G(d)) predict a single minimum for perpendicular orientation, ( φ(C–S) = 90°), with intermediate basis sets (6-311G(d,p)) an additional shallow minimum for planar orientation and with large basis sets (cc-pVTZ) the global minimum for planar orientation and an additional shallow minimum at φ(C–S) = 90°. The B3LYP/cc-pVTZ calculations result in a single minimum for planar orientation, in agreement with the GED experiment. The experimental and calculated barrier to internal rotation is about 1 kcal/mol. The following geometric parameters ( r a and ∠ h1 with 3 σ uncertainties) were derived: r(C–C) av = 1.395(3) Å, r(C(sp 2)–S) = 1.775(4) Å, r(S–CH 3) = 1.813(4) Å, ∠CSC = 104.5(5), ∠C2C1C6 = 119.3(3), ∠C1C2C3 = 120.2(4)°.
ISSN:0022-2860
1872-8014
DOI:10.1016/j.molstruc.2007.03.015