Impact of a cattle brush on feedlot steer behavior, productivity and stress physiology

• Published in: Applied animal behaviour science Vol. 228; p. 104995
• Main Authors: Park, Rachel M., Schubach, Kelsey M., Cooke, Reinaldo F., Herring, Andy D., Jennings, Jenny S., Daigle, Courtney L.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier B.V 01.07.2020
• Subjects: Aggression; Behavior; Cattle brush; Environmental enrichment; Feedlot; Stereotypies; Cattle brush; Stereotypies; Behavior; Aggression; Environmental enrichment; Feedlot
• ISSN: 0168-1591; 1872-9045
• DOI: 10.1016/j.applanim.2020.104995

•Feedlot cattle provided a cattle brush engaged in less aggression and stereotypies.•Cattle brush usage was greatest on d 0 and cattle maintained interest over time.•Cattle brush did not impact proportion of animals lying, feeding or drinking.•Over time, cattle performed less mounting, bar licking, rumination and activity.•Cattle engaged in more tongue rolling and allogrooming over time. The aim of the present study was to investigate the impact of environmental enrichment (EE), in the form of a cattle brush, on feedlot cattle behavior, productivity and stress physiology. Steers were blocked by weight and assigned to one of two treatments 1) Cattle brush secured to fence line (BRUSH; n = 3 pens; 25 animals) or 2) No enrichment (CON; n = 3 pens; 26 animals). Video recordings were decoded from 0800 to 1730 on d -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32 and 64 relative to brush implementation. Headbutting, kicking, mounting, bar licking, tongue rolling, allogrooming and brush usage were scored through continuous observation. Scan samples at 10-minute intervals were utilized to score lying, drinking and eating. Rumination and activity data were collected from rumination collars. Hair coat shed scores were recorded upon feedlot arrival (d -55) and prior to first block slaughter shipment (d 161). Body weights and hair samples for cortisol extraction were obtained at 35 d intervals. Performance measures were calculated weekly and carcass data were collected at slaughter. Impact of day, treatment, and their interaction on cattle behavior and physiological measures and the impact of treatment on performance measures was evaluated in SAS. Cattle housed in BRUSH pens performed fewer headbutts (P = 0.013) over time compared to CON cattle. For BRUSH cattle, frequency and duration of brush usage changed over time, peaking on d 0 (P < 0.01). Environmental enrichment treatment impacted mounting, bar licking, tongue rolling, allogrooming and activity levels (P < 0.05). Cattle housed in BRUSH pens engaged in fewer mounts, bar licking bouts, tongue rolling bouts and allogrooming bouts and performed all behaviors for a shorter duration of time compared to CON cattle. Research day impacted mounting, bar licking, tongue rolling, allogrooming, activity and rumination (P < 0.05). Mounting frequency, bar licking frequency, bar licking duration, activity duration and rumination duration decreased over time while frequency and duration of tongue rolling and allogrooming increased over time. A smaller proportion of steers were observed lying on d 0 and d 4 (P = 0.001) and the proportion of steers feeding decreased over time (P = 0.04). Cattle assigned to BRUSH pens performed fewer stereotypic and aggressive behaviors and cattle did not habituate to the brush suggesting that a cattle brush could provide a lasting benefit to feedlot cattle.