Contesting Subjects: International Legal Discourses on Terrorism and Indigenous Peoples’ Human Rights

• Published in: Asian journal of international law (Cambridge, U.K.) Vol. 13; no. 2; pp. 273 - 293
• Main Author: YOUNG, Stephen
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press 01.07.2023
• Subjects: Counterterrorism; Human rights; Indigenous peoples; International law; Native peoples; Natural resources; Terrorism; Terrorists; Violence; Philippines; Identification; Terrorism; Philippines; Human Rights; Subjectivity; Indigenous peoples
• ISSN: 2044-2513; 2044-2521
• DOI: 10.1017/S2044251322000534

International legal discourses clash in violent ways within the state. For example, the international discourse on human rights identifies some individuals who oppose state-sanctioned projects as Indigenous peoples while the international discourse about terrorism may identify them as terrorists. These clashes are occurring throughout the world, particularly surrounding extractive resource projects, but this article considers one example from the Philippines where some B'laan individuals and communities oppose the Tampakan Copper-Gold Mine, and examines how various actors identify those individuals and communities. It explores how some identify them as Indigenous peoples while others identify them as terrorists. In highlighting the violent effects of international law, it investigates how discourse inhibits appreciation of violent erasures and the continuing coloniality of extractive resource development.