Tillage reversal did not reverse N fertilization enhanced C storage in a Black Chernozem and a Gray Luvisol

•N fertilization and tillage reversal increased organic C more for soil with low C.•Macroaggregates were the most important fraction for C storage.•N fertilization and tillage reversal enhanced macroaggregate formation in topsoils.•Tillage reversal did not offset N fertilization-increased C storage...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inGeoderma Vol. 370; p. 114355
Main Authors Sun, Lei, Feng, Yongsheng, Dyck, Miles F, Puurveen, Dick, Chang, Scott X.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier B.V 01.07.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•N fertilization and tillage reversal increased organic C more for soil with low C.•Macroaggregates were the most important fraction for C storage.•N fertilization and tillage reversal enhanced macroaggregate formation in topsoils.•Tillage reversal did not offset N fertilization-increased C storage in topsoils. Nitrogen (N) fertilization and reversing land management from long-term no tillage (NT) to conventional tillage (tillage reversal; TR) may markedly alter soil carbon (C) dynamics. We studied the impact of N fertilization, N applied at 100 kg ha−1 yr−1 (N100) vs. no N application (N0), and tillage reversal (NT vs. TR) on soil aggregation and aggregate-associated C in top- (0–10) and subsoils (50–60 cm) in a Black Chernozem and a Gray Luvisol. Our results showed that soil organic C content was greater in N100 (1.74 g C kg−1) than in N0 (1.29 g C kg−1), and in TR (1.71 g C kg−1) than in NT (1.32 g C kg−1) only in the topsoil of the Gray Luvisol. Nitrogen fertilization and tillage reversal improved topsoil, but not subsoil mean weight diameter or the amount of large macroaggregates (>2000 μm). Topsoil aggregate-associated C was only increased (P < 0.01) with N fertilization. Microaggregate-associated C in the topsoil of the Black Chernozem was 70.6 g C kg−1 sand-free water-stable aggregate in N100, which was 13.8% higher (P < 0.01) than that in N0. However, C associated with all aggregate fractions in the topsoil was increased (P < 0.05) by N fertilization in the Gray Luvisol. In the Black Chernozem, the physical protection for C in the subsoil was decreased by N fertilization and tillage reversal, as indicated by decreased large macroaggregate and microaggregate-associated C (P = 0.04 and < 0.001, respectively). Subsoil aggregate-associated C was not influenced by N fertilization or tillage reversal in the Gray Luvisol. We conclude that N fertilization and/or tillage reversal improved topsoil aggregation; only N fertilization improved the physical protection for C in the topsoil. The adoption of tillage reversal (2 years) did not offset the benefit of N fertilization on soil aggregation and soil C concentration.
ISSN:0016-7061
1872-6259
DOI:10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114355