Accurate calculation of binding energies for molecular clusters – Assessment of different models

[Display omitted] •Determination of a suitable reference for high-level benchmark studies.•Assessment of the local errors due to the incremental scheme.•Computation of highly accurate CCSD(T)/CBS benchmark values for binding energies.•Assessment of different state-of-the-art methods for binding ener...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inChemical physics Vol. 472; pp. 72 - 80
Main Authors Friedrich, Joachim, Fiedler, Benjamin
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier B.V 15.06.2016
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:[Display omitted] •Determination of a suitable reference for high-level benchmark studies.•Assessment of the local errors due to the incremental scheme.•Computation of highly accurate CCSD(T)/CBS benchmark values for binding energies.•Assessment of different state-of-the-art methods for binding energies. In this work we test different strategies to compute high-level benchmark energies for medium-sized molecular clusters. We use the incremental scheme to obtain CCSD(T)/CBS energies for our test set and carefully validate the accuracy for binding energies by statistical measures. The local errors of the incremental scheme are <1kJ/mol. Since they are smaller than the basis set errors, we obtain higher total accuracy due to the applicability of larger basis sets. The final CCSD(T)/CBS benchmark values are ΔE=-278.01kJ/mol for (H2O)10,ΔE=-221.64kJ/mol for (HF)10,ΔE=-45.63kJ/mol for (CH4)10,ΔE=-19.52kJ/mol for (H2)20 and ΔE=-7.38kJ/mol for (H2)10. Furthermore we test state-of-the-art wave-function-based and DFT methods. Our benchmark data will be very useful for critical validations of new methods. We find focal-point-methods for estimating CCSD(T)/CBS energies to be highly accurate and efficient. For foQ-i3CCSD(T)—MP2/TZ we get a mean error of 0.34kJ/mol and a standard deviation of 0.39kJ/mol.
ISSN:0301-0104
DOI:10.1016/j.chemphys.2016.02.022