Affective and cognitive factors that hinder the banking relationships of economically vulnerable consumers

PurposeThe aim of this paper is to explore the affective and cognitive factors that condition banking relationships for economically vulnerable consumers and how these factors contribute to increasing financial difficulties and exclusion. This research, performed on a set of focus groups, bases its...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of bank marketing Vol. 40; no. 7; pp. 1337 - 1363
Main Authors de la Cuesta-González, Marta, Fernandez-Olit, Beatriz, Orenes-Casanova, Isabel, Paredes-Gazquez, Juandiego
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Bradford Emerald Publishing Limited 17.11.2022
Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:PurposeThe aim of this paper is to explore the affective and cognitive factors that condition banking relationships for economically vulnerable consumers and how these factors contribute to increasing financial difficulties and exclusion. This research, performed on a set of focus groups, bases its findings on a combination of experimental and discourse analysis methods.Design/methodology/approachFinancial decisions are not rational and can be biased by affective and cognitive factors. Behavioural finance has focused very little on analysing how consumer biases influence relationships with banking institutions. Additionally, these relationships are affected by the digitalization and transformation of banking business. Thus, in the case of economically vulnerable consumers, who are not profitable for the increasingly competitive banking industry and lack financial abilities, their risk of financial exclusion is increasing.FindingsThe results show that distrust and shame lead to financial difficulties in economically vulnerable consumers. Distrust generates problems of access and self-exclusion, while shame generates difficulties of use. This lack of trust makes them more rational when dealing with machines than with people, showing greater banking difficulties for consumers with a “person-suspicious” profile.Originality/valueThis finding can help regulators establish limits on banking behaviour, require banks to incorporate affective and cognitive factors in their convenience tests and detect new variables that can help them improve their insolvency ratios and reputations.
ISSN:0265-2323
1758-5937
DOI:10.1108/IJBM-10-2021-0491