Defending History? The Impact of Context and Speaker in Russia

• Published in: Perspectives on politics Vol. 22; no. 1; pp. 263 - 279
• Main Authors: Krawatzek, Félix, Soroka, George
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New York, USA Cambridge University Press 01.03.2024
• ISSN: 1537-5927; 1541-0986
• DOI: 10.1017/S1537592722004169

Political attempts to control how the past may be represented have flourished in the twenty-first century. Russia participates in this trend, having taken steps to legislatively and juridically safeguard the legacy of the USSR’s involvement in World War II. This has institutionalized an interpretation of the fight against Nazism that was already widely held in society, making the Russian case a “hard test” for evaluating when the violation of a historical norm is deemed appropriate and what the impact of a memory law might be relative to other factors. Drawing on two vignette experiments conducted in 2021, our article demonstrates both that the discursive context in which a controversial statement about the past is made matters when respondents assess whether the person making it should be punished and that criticism of a historical norm is more likely to be accepted when it emanates from an in-group member. We also find that the state has limited ability to influence societal attitudes regarding history. Moreover, a willingness to defend state-led interventions into how the past is depicted aligns with support for the political system but the latter does not necessarily overlap with individuals’ historical views, underscoring the multidimensional nature of collective memory.