Making Equity the Priority

We did not know what it would be or when it would happen, but most public health professionals knew that, sooner or later, we would experience a pandemic of some kind. COVID-19 was, in many ways, the test we had all been waiting to take. More than a year and a half later, although we are not exactly...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAmerican journal of public health (1971) Vol. 111; no. S3; pp. S174 - S175
Main Author LaVeist, Thomas A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Washington American Public Health Association 01.10.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:We did not know what it would be or when it would happen, but most public health professionals knew that, sooner or later, we would experience a pandemic of some kind. COVID-19 was, in many ways, the test we had all been waiting to take. More than a year and a half later, although we are not exactly failing the test, we are definitely falling short in areas in which we optimistically vowed to excel. In 2016, public health leaders from the US Department of Health and Human Services began highlighting a concept called Public Health 3.0.1 Their idea was that the modern age of public health (Public Health 1.0) began around the dawn of the 20th century when scientists significantly advanced understanding of infectious diseases and developed vaccines and antibiotics to address them. The second wave-Public Health 2.0-was kicked off by the Institute of Medicine's 1988 report The Future of Public Health.2 Following that report, we saw the expansion of governmental agencies to coordinate and manage the public's health, organizations that have played a critical part in the response to COVID-19.
Bibliography:SourceType-Other Sources-1
content type line 63
ObjectType-Editorial-2
ObjectType-Commentary-1
ISSN:0090-0036
1541-0048
DOI:10.2105/AJPH.2021.306546