Assessing the suitability of video-assisted anal fistula treatment for obese patients compared to conventional surgery: a question worth investigating

• Published in: International journal of colorectal disease Vol. 39; no. 1; p. 108
• Main Authors: Tang, Xiao-Li, Xu, Zi-Yang, Yang, Jun, Yang, Zhe, Wang, Zhi-Gang, Zhang, Zheng-Yun, Yao, Jing
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 15.07.2024; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Adult; Body Mass Index; Female; Fistula; Fistulae; Gastroenterology; Hepatology; Humans; Internal Medicine; Length of Stay; Male; Medical innovations; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Middle Aged; Obesity; Obesity - complications; Obesity - surgery; Operative Time; Pain; Patients; Proctology; Rectal Fistula - etiology; Rectal Fistula - surgery; Recurrence; Risk Factors; Surgery; Treatment Outcome; Video-Assisted Surgery; Surgical outcomes; Recurrence; Video-assisted anal fistula treatment; Anal fistula; Cutting seton
• ISSN: 1432-1262; 0179-1958; 1432-1262
• DOI: 10.1007/s00384-024-04683-y

Background and aims Video-assisted anal fistula treatment (VAAFT) is an innovative surgical approach enabling the direct visualization of the fistula tract structure. This study aims to assess the efficacy of VAAFT in comparison with that of traditional surgical methods and explore potential risk factors contributing to fistula recurrence to provide new recommendations for surgical selection. Materials and methods Information was collected from 100 patients with complex anal fistula (CAF) in our hospital who underwent surgical treatment from January 2021 to January 2023. We compared the baseline information and surgical outcomes of two groups, analyzed the risk factors for fistula recurrence by using logistic regression analysis, and conducted further exploration by using the body mass index. Results Equal numbers of patients underwent VAAFT and traditional surgeries, and no significant differences in baseline information were observed. Patients who received VAAFT experienced less intraoperative bleeding (15.5 (14.0–20.0) vs. 32.0 (25.0–36.0)), shorter hospital stays (2.0 (2.0–2.5) vs. 3.0 (3.0–3.5)), reduced postoperative pain and wound discharge, but longer operative times (43.3 ± 6.9 vs. 35.0 (31.5–40.0)) compared with patients who underwent traditional surgeries. No significant differences in recurrence rates were found three and six months after operation (the p -values were 0.790 and 0.806, respectively). However, the Wexner scores of the VAAFT group were significantly low in the first follow-up (0 (0–1.0) vs. 2.0 (1.0–2.0)). Postoperative recurrence of fistulas may be associated with obesity ( p -value = 0.040), especially in patients undergoing traditional surgeries ( p -value = 0.036). Conclusion VAAFT offers advantages, such as less pain, less trauma, and faster recovery, compared with traditional surgical treatment. Obese patients with CAF are prone to recurrence, and we recommend that they undergo VAAFT treatment rather than traditional surgeries.