Interactions between root restriction, irrigation and rootstock treatments on 'Queen Cox' apple trees: Effects of soil and plant water relations

• Published in: The journal of horticultural science & biotechnology Vol. 75; no. 4; pp. 376 - 382
• Main Authors: Atkinson, C. J., Webster, A. D., Vaughan, S. P., Taylor, L., Kingswell, G.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Taylor & Francis 2000
• ISSN: 1462-0316; 2380-4084
• DOI: 10.1080/14620316.2000.11511254

The purpose of this research was to determine if established, orchard-grown apple trees that were con®ned in root-restricting membranes received adequate water for growth when irrigated. Previous data had shown positive effects of root restriction on reducing shoot extension growth in apple. Soil matric potential (Ψ sm ), leaf stomatal conductance (g) and leaf water potentials (Ψ l ) were measured over daily cycles during the period of maximum tree water use (July and August). Measurements were also made of the Ψ sm and fruit size throughout the growing season. Daily and seasonal Ψ sm showed that the soil within the root restricting membranes (+R) when irrigated (+I) remained closed to field capacity (<100 HPa), which was not the case for unirrigated soil within the membranes (-I +R). Ψ l measured before dawn, showed that similar levels of drought stress were evident between irrigated and restricted (+I +R) and unrestricted (+I -R and -I -R) trees. The Ψ sm , and Ψ l for trees with roots within restricting membranes were significantly more negative, in the absence of irrigation (-I +R). Measurement of g showed that root restricted trees were transpiring at similar rates in the presence of irrigation (+I +R) as unrestricted trees (+I -R) with or without irrigation. Stomatal closure could not explain the increased Ψ l observed for the restricted irrigated (+I +R) treatment compared with unrestricted (-R) trees. A reduced stomatal aperture was the most likely explanation for the reduction in growth previously observed with the restricted unirrigated trees. Fruit size was also affected by root restriction and the effect became greater as the roots became more restricted with tree age. Similarly, there was also a negative effect, in one year, of root restriction on fruit size at harvest, even in the presence of irrigation. Data show that reductions in soil water availability, Ψ l and g, for the root-restricted trees (+I +R), were unlikely to be the causes for the previously observed reductions in shoot growth (tree size). These results imply that other factors were in operation, among which root-synthesized chemical regulators of shoot growth are the most likely candidates.