Retrieval performance of Google, Yahoo and Bing for navigational queries in the field of “life science and biomedicine”

• Published in: Data technologies and applications Vol. 54; no. 2; pp. 133 - 150
• Main Authors: Gul, Sumeer, Ali, Sabha, Hussain, Aabid
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Bingley Emerald Publishing Limited 02.06.2020; Emerald Group Publishing Limited
• Subjects: Algorithms; Efficiency; Information retrieval; Language; Life sciences; Online Searching; Performance evaluation; Queries; Ranking; Recall; Retrieval performance measures; Search engines; Websites; Google; Retrieval effectiveness; Retrieval efficiency; Yahoo; Navigational Queries; Precision; Search engines; Recall; Relative recall; Bing
• ISSN: 2514-9288; 2514-9318
• DOI: 10.1108/DTA-05-2019-0083

PurposeThe purpose of this study is to assess the retrieval performance of three search engines, i.e. Google, Yahoo and Bing for navigational queries using two important retrieval measures, i.e. precision and relative recall in the field of life science and biomedicine.Design/methodology/approachTop three search engines namely Google, Yahoo and Bing were selected on the basis of their ranking as per Alexa, an analytical tool that provides ranking of global websites. Furthermore, the scope of study was confined to those search engines having interface in English. Clarivate Analytics' Web of Science was used for the extraction of navigational queries in the field of life science and biomedicine. Navigational queries (classified as one-word, two-word and three-word queries) were extracted from the keywords of the papers representing the top 100 contributing authors in the select field. Keywords were also checked for the duplication. Two important evaluation parameters, i.e. precision and relative recall were used to calculate the performance of search engines on the navigational queries.FindingsThe mean precision for Google scores high (2.30) followed by Yahoo (2.29) and Bing (1.68), while mean relative recall also scores high for Google (0.36) followed by Yahoo (0.33) and Bing (0.31) respectively.Research limitations/implicationsThe study is of great help to the researchers and academia in determining the retrieval efficiency of Google, Yahoo and Bing in terms of navigational query execution in the field of life science and biomedicine. The study can help users to focus on various search processes and the query structuring and its execution across the select search engines for achieving desired result list in a professional search environment. The study can also act as a ready reference source for exploring navigational queries and how these queries can be managed in the context of information retrieval process. It will also help to showcase the retrieval efficiency of various search engines on the basis of subject diversity (life science and biomedicine) highlighting the same in terms of query intention.Originality/valueThough many studies have been conducted highlighting the retrieval efficiency of search engines the current work is the first of its kind to study the retrieval effectiveness of Google, Yahoo and Bing on navigational queries in the field of life science and biomedicine. The study will help in understanding various methods and approaches to be adopted by the users for the navigational query execution across a professional search environment, i.e. “life science and biomedicine”