Periprosthetic knee fractures in an elderly population: open reduction and internal fixation vs distal femur megaprostheses

The incidence of periprosthetic fractures of distal femur (PPDFFx) after primary total knee arthroplasties is described around 0.3% and 2.5% and it is increasing as the number of patients with total knee arthroplasty continues to arise. surgical options treatments for PPDFFx include fixation in the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inOrthopedic Reviews Vol. 14; no. 2; p. 33772
Main Authors De Marco, Davide, Messina, Federica, Meschini, Cesare, Oliva, Maria Serena, Rovere, Giuseppe, Maccagnano, Giuseppe, Noia, Giovanni, Maccauro, Giulio, Ziranu, Antonio
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Open Medical Publishing 01.01.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The incidence of periprosthetic fractures of distal femur (PPDFFx) after primary total knee arthroplasties is described around 0.3% and 2.5% and it is increasing as the number of patients with total knee arthroplasty continues to arise. surgical options treatments for PPDFFx include fixation in the form of eather Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), or retrograde intramedullary nailing (RIMN), or conventional (non locked) plating, or locked plating such as the Less Invasive Stabilization System (LISS), or dynamic condylar screws. In recent years, however, the use of megaprostheses has been increasing. Patients with periprosthetic fractures of distal femur after primary total knee arthroplasties treated with ORIF or with the use of Distal femur replacement (DFR) were retrospectively analyzed in this to evaluate differences in intra-operative blood loss, need of blood trasfusion, weight bearing, range of motion, rate of complications, rate of revision surgery and functional outcome according Oxford Knee Score between two groups. Treatment of Periprosthetic distal femur fracture remains controversial. While ORIF seems to guarantee less percentage of complications and reoperation rate, those treated with megaprosthesis seem to gain better range of motion in a very short post-operative time. In the future it will be necessary to investigate with greater numbers possible advantages and disadvantages of the various treatments in periprosthetic distal femur fractures.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Corresponding author: Cesare Meschini; cesare.meschini@gmail.com - Department of Orthopaedics, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore Roma, Largo F. Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy
ISSN:2035-8164
2035-8237
2035-8164
DOI:10.52965/001c.33772