Information transmission in non-visual fingertip matching along a horizontal track in the median plane

• Published in: Biological cybernetics Vol. 58; no. 3; pp. 141 - 148
• Main Authors: Crowe, Alan, de Ruiter, Tars, Blaauw, Menno, Oosthoek, Bas
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Heidelberg Springer 01.01.1988; Berlin
• Subjects: Adult; Biological and medical sciences; Female; Fingers; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Humans; Information Theory; Male; Mathematics; Middle Aged; Motor control and motor pathways. Reflexes. Control centers of vegetative functions. Vestibular system and equilibration; Movement; Proprioception; Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs; Human; Goal directed movement; Positional information; Arm; Finger; Body movement
• ISSN: 0340-1200; 1432-0770
• DOI: 10.1007/BF00364133

Non-visually triggered arm movements over a horizontal table at shoulder height were analysed by an Information Theory approach according to a method suggested by Sakitt et al. (1983) and Sakitt (1980). The movement track was along the subject's median line and was indicated by a vertical metal ridge fixed to the table. The observer passively moved the subject's left index finger along the left side of the ridge to the target position. The blindfolded subject then had to move his right index finger along the right side of the ridge to match the left finger position. Direct contact between the two fingers was prevented by the ridge. We compared our results, which involve the transmission of information through the arm and shoulder joints of both arms, with those of Sakitt et al. which involved just one elbow joint. We supplemented our experimental results with simulations and show that the value for the transmitted information, obtained using the method of analysis suggested by Sakitt et al., is very dependent upon the number of trials, and number and spacing of the targets. Sakitt et al. suggest that the Information Theory approach permits easy comparison between different tasks and different observers. Our results suggest that comparisons should be made with caution.