Systematic review of the free thoracodorsal artery perforator flap for head and neck reconstruction

• Published in: American journal of otolaryngology Vol. 45; no. 2; p. 104154
• Main Authors: Razmi, Samuel E., Entezami, Payam, Asarkar, Ameya A., Ware, Erin, Hayden, Richard E., Chang, Brent A.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01.03.2024
• Subjects: Arteries; Head - surgery; Head and neck reconstruction; Humans; Neck - surgery; Perforator Flap - blood supply; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology; Postoperative Complications - etiology; Systematic review; TDAP flap; Thoracodorsal artery perforator flap; Systematic review; Head and neck reconstruction; TDAP flap; Thoracodorsal artery perforator flap
• ISSN: 0196-0709; 1532-818X
• DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2023.104154

The thoracodorsal artery perforator (TDAP) flap has gained interest as a option for reconstruction of head and neck defects while minimizing donor site morbidity as compared to traditional workhorse flaps. The primary aim of this systematic review is to assess the postoperative outcomes and efficacy of this flap. Several databases were screened for relevant citations. The quality of studies and risk of bias were evaluated using the MINORS scoring system. Twenty articles containing 168 patients undergoing at least one TDAP flap reconstruction met the inclusion criteria. There were no incidences of total flap failure and only 10 incidences of partial flap failure (5.95 %). Flap complications and donor site morbidity was low. The average MINORS score of the studies suggested a moderately high amount of bias. Based on limited quality evidence, this review suggests that TDAP flap is a safe and feasible option for head and neck reconstruction with comparable success rates as other commonly used flaps, with low complication rate and donor site morbidity. Further large-scale studies are warranted.