Medium-term outcome of different surgical methods to cure atrial fibrillation: is less worse?

a Department of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands b Department of Cardiology, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands c Department of Cardiology, University of Utrecht, The Netherlands *Corresponding author. Koekoekslaan 1, 3430 EM Nieuwegein, The N...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInteractive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery Vol. 7; no. 2; pp. 201 - 206
Main Authors Geuzebroek, Guillaume S.C, Ballaux, Philippe K.E.W, van Hemel, Norbert M, Kelder, Johannes C, Defauw, Jo J.A.M.T
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Eur Assoc Cardio Surg 01.04.2008
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:a Department of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands b Department of Cardiology, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands c Department of Cardiology, University of Utrecht, The Netherlands *Corresponding author. Koekoekslaan 1, 3430 EM Nieuwegein, The Netherlands. Tel.: +31-306099111; fax: +31-306092120. E-mail address : G.S.C.Geuzebroek{at}gmail.com (G.S.C. Geuzebroek). Different lesion sets and ablation techniques have been performed. We compared these outcomes in search of the best method. We performed a retrospective analysis of patients who have undergone AF surgery different from the maze III. The surgical lesion sets were pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) alone, left atrial maze (LAM) and bi-atrial maze (BAM) and were made with different ablation techniques. During surgery one patient died due to bleeding of a pulmonary vein. The number of patients in the PVI-, LAM-, BAM-groups was 12, 28 and 26, respectively, with freedom from AF at latest follow-up [22.0±15.6 (3.1–81.2) months] of 33%, 59% and 60%, respectively. Atrial flutter occurred less in the BAM-group (4%) than in the left-sided procedures (15.4%) ( P =0.231). Multivariate analysis demonstrated a higher recurrence of AF for PVI alone (OR 4.42, CL 0.95–20.6, P =0.0583) and a lower recurrence for the ‘cut-and-sew’ technique (OR 0.13, CL 0.030–0.60, P =0.0084). Left- and bi-atrial maze procedures are equally effective in the suppression of AF, whereas omission of right-sided lesions results in a higher prevalence of atrial flutter. The ‘cut-and-sew’ technique is superior in terms of freedom from AF compared to bipolar and unipolar radiofrequency. Key Words: Atrial fibrillation; Rhythm surgery; Maze; Arrhythmia Related Article eComment: Bilateral atrial appendage excision should be performed routinely in the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation Bachar El Oumeiri, Parla Astarci, and Valérie Lacroix Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery 2008 7: 205-206. [Full Text] [PDF]
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1569-9293
1569-9285
DOI:10.1510/icvts.2007.159889