Deconstructing forearm casting task by videos with step-by-step simulation teaching improved performance of medical students: is making working student’s memory work better similar to a process of artificial intelligence or just an improvement of the prefrontal cortex homunculus?

• Published in: International orthopaedics Vol. 47; no. 2; pp. 467 - 477
• Main Authors: Bouthors, Charlie, Veil, Raphael, Auregan, Jean-Charles, Molina, Véronique, Blanié, Antonia, Court, Charles, Benhamou, Dan
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01.02.2023; Springer Verlag
• Subjects: Artificial Intelligence; Clinical Competence; Forearm; Humans; Invited Papers; Life Sciences; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Orthopedics; Students, Medical; Undergraduate medical students; Simulation; Peyton’s 4-step approach; Halsted’s see one do one approach; Forearm cast; Surgical education
• ISSN: 0341-2695; 1432-5195
• DOI: 10.1007/s00264-022-05626-4

Purpose To compare two teaching methods of a forearm cast in medical students through simulation, the traditional method (Trad) based on a continuous demonstration of the procedure and the task deconstruction method (Decon) with the procedure fragmenting into its constituent parts using videos. Methods During simulation training of the below elbow casting technique, 64 medical students were randomized in two groups. Trad group demonstrated the entire procedure without pausing. Decon group received step-wise teaching with educational videos emphasizing key components of the procedure. Direct and video evaluations were performed immediately after training (day 0) and at six months. Performance in casting was assessed using a 25-item checklist, a seven item global rating scale (GRS Performance), and a one item GRS (GRS Final Product). Results Fifty-two students (Trad n  = 24; Decon n  = 28) underwent both day zero and six month assessments. At day zero, the Decon group showed higher performance via video evaluation for OSATS ( p  = 0.035); GRS performance ( p  < 0.001); GRS final product ( p  < 0.001), and for GRS performance ( p  < 0.001) and GRS final product ( p  = 0.011) via direct evaluation. After six months, performance was decreased in both groups with ultimately no difference in performance between groups via both direct and video evaluation. Having done a rotation in orthopaedic surgery was the only independent factor associated to higher performance. Conclusions The modified video-based version simulation led to a higher performance than the traditional method immediately after the course and could be the preferred method for teaching complex skills.