Wildlife-vehicle collisions: The disproportionate risk of injury faced by motorcyclists

• Published in: Injury Vol. 55; no. 5; p. 111301
• Main Authors: Bíl, Michal, Andrášik, Richard, Bílová, Martina
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Netherlands Elsevier Ltd 01.05.2024
• Subjects: Evading manoeuvre; Helmet; Roe deer; Seat belt; Traffic crash; Wild boar; Seat belt; Evading manoeuvre; Roe deer; Helmet; Traffic crash; Wild boar
• ISSN: 0020-1383; 1879-0267
• DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2023.111301

We applied a generalized linear mixed-effects model to determine the factors leading to injuries from wildlife-vehicle collisions (WVCs). We used the Police database representing WVCs which took place on the Czech road network between 2009 and 2022. The majority of WVCs in Czechia are with roe deer, followed by wild boar, i.e., both relatively small ungulates. Less than 2 % of these encounters ends with an injury to the motor vehicle occupants. We found that the probability of sustaining injury was systematically higher for motorcyclists than for car occupants. The odds of sustaining an injury during WVC were roughly 1600 times higher for motorcyclists than for car occupants. When applying an evading manoeuvre, the odds of sustaining an injury were approximately 68 times higher for car occupants while only 2.3 times higher for motorcyclists compared to a direct hit to an animal. The lack of helmets (for motorcyclists) and missing seat belts (for car occupants) were additional factors which made the outcomes worse for WVCs. While the acceptance of a direct hit (preceded by braking) seems to be a reasonable strategy for car drivers, WVC awareness (including maintaining a lower speed during critical times and places) should be raised among motorcyclists as both manoeuvres are almost comparably dangerous for them.