Economic analysis of China’s grain for green policy: theory and evidence

First phase of the grain for green (GFG) policy, one of the China’s forest policies, was implemented in the late 1990s and ended in 2012. The first phase of the GFG policy was successful from a macro perspective, although there were some failures. Based on these outcomes, the second phase of the GFG...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAsia-Pacific journal of regional science Vol. 8; no. 1; pp. 355 - 376
Main Authors Jin, Chenghua, Yabuta, Masahiro
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Singapore Springer Nature Singapore 01.03.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:First phase of the grain for green (GFG) policy, one of the China’s forest policies, was implemented in the late 1990s and ended in 2012. The first phase of the GFG policy was successful from a macro perspective, although there were some failures. Based on these outcomes, the second phase of the GFG policy was implemented from 2014 to 2020. This study used panel data to develop an empirical land use model and conduct a comparative static analysis focusing on the GFG policy. Results of the static analysis confirmed factors that affect GFG for the years 2002–2018. In addition, differences in the explanatory variables between the first (2002–2012) and second periods (2014–2018) were determined. Furthermore, differences in GFG subsidies between the northern and southern provinces in the first phase were analyzed for their effects on a reforestation area. The main results revealed that the amount of investment in GFG and rural livelihood security had a positive effect on the expansion of the area of GFG. In addition, the amount of investment in GFG was more effective during the second period than the first period.
ISSN:2509-7946
2509-7954
DOI:10.1007/s41685-024-00331-z