Chemiosmotic and murburn explanations for aerobic respiration: Predictive capabilities, structure-function correlations and chemico-physical logic
Since mid-1970s, the proton-centric proposal of ‘chemiosmosis’ became the acclaimed explanation for aerobic respiration. Recently, significant theoretical and experimental evidence were presented for an oxygen-centric ‘murburn’ mechanism of mitochondrial ATP-synthesis. Herein, we compare the predict...
Saved in:
Published in | Archives of biochemistry and biophysics Vol. 676; p. 108128 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Elsevier Inc
15.11.2019
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Since mid-1970s, the proton-centric proposal of ‘chemiosmosis’ became the acclaimed explanation for aerobic respiration. Recently, significant theoretical and experimental evidence were presented for an oxygen-centric ‘murburn’ mechanism of mitochondrial ATP-synthesis. Herein, we compare the predictive capabilities of the two models with respect to the available information on mitochondrial reaction chemistry and the membrane proteins' structure-function correlations. Next, fundamental queries are addressed on thermodynamics of mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation (mOxPhos): (1) Can the energy of oxygen reduction be utilized for proton transport? (2) Is the trans-membrane proton differential harness-able as a potential energy capable of doing useful work? and (3) Whether the movement of miniscule amounts of mitochondrial protons could give rise to a potential of ~200 mV and if such an electrical energy could sponsor ATP-synthesis. Further, we explore critically if rotary ATPsynthase activity of Complex V can account for physiological ATP-turnovers. We also answer the question- “What is the role of protons in the oxygen-centric murburn scheme of aerobic respiration?” Finally, it is demonstrated that the murburn reaction model explains the fast kinetics, non-integral stoichiometry and high yield of mOxPhos. Strategies are charted to further demarcate the two explanations' relevance in the cellular physiology of aerobic respiration.
•Chemiosmotic & murburn explanations for aerobic respiration are compared.•Structure-function correlations of the two models are elucidated graphically.•Thermodynamics & reaction logic of both theories are critically assessed.•Kinetics & variable stoichiometry of aerobic respiration is tangibly explained. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0003-9861 1096-0384 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.abb.2019.108128 |