Comparison of dynamic MRI at 3.0T and MDCT of pancreatobiliary disease: Evaluation with source, MPR, CPR, and MIP images for image quality and hepatic arterial and portal venous vessel conspicuity

Purpose To compare contrast material‐enhanced three‐dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 3.0T and multidetector row computed tomography (MDCT) in the same patient with regard to image quality of pancreatobiliary disease and hepatic vascular conspicuity. Materials and Methods This stu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of magnetic resonance imaging Vol. 29; no. 4; pp. 846 - 852
Main Authors Uchida, Masafumi, Sakoda, Jun, Arikawa, Shunji, Kunou, Yukiko, Ishibashi, Masatoshi, Abe, Toshi, Hayabuchi, Naofumi
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company 01.04.2009
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Purpose To compare contrast material‐enhanced three‐dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 3.0T and multidetector row computed tomography (MDCT) in the same patient with regard to image quality of pancreatobiliary disease and hepatic vascular conspicuity. Materials and Methods This study enrolled 32 patients with pancreatobiliary disease who underwent both gadolinium‐enhanced 3D dynamic MRI and multiphasic CT using 16‐MDCT. Data analysis of image quality was performed by two radiologists based on source images, multiplanar reconstruction (MPR), curved planar reconstruction (CPR), and maximum intensity projection (MIP) reconstruction. Determination of image quality was based on a 4‐point image quality rating scale. Results The overall image quality of the MRI axial images was superior to that of the axial MDCT images. The MRI protocol yielded an average score of 3.8 points versus 3.5 for the CT imaging. No significant difference was found between 3.0T MRI and MDCT images in MPR or CPR image quality. Image quality for visualization of the distal intrahepatic segmental arteries was significantly improved using MDCT imaging. No significant difference was found between the MDCT and 3.0T MR in portal vein branch image quality. Conclusion High‐resolution dynamic contrast‐enhanced MR imaging at 3.0T is a comprehensive technique which provides high image quality in pancreatobiliary disease. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2009;29:846–852. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Bibliography:istex:6F53AEEFA5AAEE78075866C4C289E9CC662F71F4
ark:/67375/WNG-SXF27BLQ-2
ArticleID:JMRI21701
ISSN:1053-1807
1522-2586
DOI:10.1002/jmri.21701