Microsurgical and Endovascular Treatment Outcomes in Pericallosal Artery Aneurysms: A Single Center Retrospective Analysis

• Published in: Turkish neurosurgery Vol. 30; no. 2; pp. 285 - 292
• Main Authors: Zhai, Xiao-Dong, Li, Chuan-Jie, Yu, Jia-Xing, He, Chuan, Ye, Ming, Hu, Peng, Geng, Jie-Wen, Xiang, Si-Shi, Ma, Yong-Jie, Zhang, Hong-Qi
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Turkey 01.01.2020
• ISSN: 1019-5149
• DOI: 10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.27824-19.5

To summarize the clinical outcomes, follow-up results and to discuss the optimal therapeutic strategy for pericallosal artery aneurysms (PAAs). From January 2013 to May 2017, the charts of 49 patients with PAAs, representing 2.43% of 2,018 consecutive patients with intracranial aneurysms (IAs) were reviewed. The clinical and radiological data of these patients were retrospectively analyzed. There were no technical failures in the clipping group, but one patient in the coiling group presented rebleeding during the operation, resulting in a poor prognosis. Although the difference was not significant, the coiling group had a better complete recovery rate than the clipping group [overall: coiling, n=20 (87.0%) vs clipping, n=11 (68.8%), p=0.33; unruptured PAAs: coiling, n=12 (92.3%) vs clipping, n=5 (83.3%); ruptured PAAs: coiling, n=8 (80%) vs clipping, n=6 (60%), p=0.63]. One patient in the coiling group exhibited recurrence. No patients experienced rebleeding during the follow-up period in either group. In our study, both endovascular coiling and microsurgery were technically feasible and achieved favorable clinical outcomes in patients with PAAs. Longer radiological follow-up is necessary. Patients should be evaluated by a multidisciplinary team prior to determining the optimal treatment modality.