Moderate-intensity exercise with blood flow restriction on cardiopulmonary kinetics and efficiency during a subsequent high-intensity exercise in young women: A cross-sectional study

• Published in: Medicine (Baltimore) Vol. 100; no. 31; p. e25368
• Main Authors: Borges, Robson F, Chiappa, Gaspar R, Muller, Paulo T, de Lima, Alexandra Correa Gervazoni Balbuena, Cahalin, Lawrence Patrick, Cipriano, Graziella França Bernardelli, Cipriano, Jr, Gerson
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 06.08.2021
• Subjects: Cross-Sectional Studies; Exercise - physiology; Exercise Tolerance; Female; Heart Rate; Humans; Ischemic Preconditioning; Observational Study; Oxygen Consumption; Prospective Studies; Regional Blood Flow - physiology; Stroke Volume; Young Adult
• ISSN: 0025-7974; 1536-5964
• DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000025368

Blood flow restriction (BFR) training applied prior to a subsequent exercise has been used as a method to induce changes in oxygen uptake pulmonary kinetics (O2P) and exercise performance. However, the effects of a moderate-intensity training associated with BFR on a subsequent high-intensity exercise on O2P and cardiac output (QT) kinetics, exercise tolerance, and efficiency remain unknown.This prospective physiologic study was performed at the Exercise Physiology Lab, University of Brasilia. Ten healthy females (mean ± SD values: age = 21.3 ± 2.2 years; height = 1.6 ± 0.07 m, and weight = 55.6 ± 8.8 kg) underwent moderate-intensity training associated with or without BFR for 6 minutes prior to a maximal high-intensity exercise bout. O2P, heart rate, and QT kinetics and gross efficiency were obtained during the high-intensity constant workload exercise test.No differences were observed in O2P, heart rate, and QT kinetics in the subsequent high-intensity exercise following BFR training. However, exercise tolerance and gross efficiency were significantly greater after BFR (220 ± 45 vs 136 ± 30 seconds; P < .05, and 32.8 ± 6.3 vs 27.1 ± 5.4%; P < .05, respectively), which also resulted in lower oxygen cost (1382 ± 227 vs 1695 ± 305 mL min-1).We concluded that moderate-intensity BFR training implemented prior to a high-intensity protocol did not accelerate subsequent O2P and QT kinetics, but it has the potential to improve both exercise tolerance and work efficiency at high workloads.