When do the Kahn-Kalai bounds provide nontrivial information?
The Park-Pham theorem (previously known as the Kahn-Kalai conjecture) bounds the critical probability, p c ( F ) , of the a nontrivial property F ⊆ 2 X that is closed under supersets by the product of a universal constant K , the expectation threshold of the property, q ( F ) , and the logarithm of...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of inequalities and applications Vol. 2025; no. 1; pp. 23 - 7 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Cham
Springer International Publishing
26.02.2025
Springer Nature B.V SpringerOpen |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The Park-Pham theorem (previously known as the Kahn-Kalai conjecture) bounds the critical probability,
p
c
(
F
)
, of the a nontrivial property
F
⊆
2
X
that is closed under supersets by the product of a universal constant
K
, the expectation threshold of the property,
q
(
F
)
, and the logarithm of the size of the property’s largest minimal element,
log
ℓ
(
F
)
. That is, the Park-Pham theorem asserts that
p
c
(
F
)
≤
K
q
(
F
)
log
ℓ
(
F
)
. Since the critical probability
p
c
(
F
)
always satisfies
p
c
(
F
)
<
1
, one may ask when the upper bound posed by Kahn and Kalai gives us more information than this–that is, when is it true that
K
q
(
F
)
log
ℓ
(
F
)
<
1
? In this short note, we provide a number of necessary conditions for this to happen and give a few sufficient conditions for the bounds to provide new (and, in fact, asymptotically perfect) information along the way. In the most interesting case where
ℓ
(
F
n
)
→
∞
, we prove the following relatively strong necessary condition for the Kahn-Kalai bounds to provide nontrivial information: For every positive integer
t
, every collection of all-but-
t
of the minimal elements of
F
n
may have nonempty intersection for only finitely many
n
. Consequently, not only must the number of minimal elements become arbitrarily large, but so too must the size of any cover. Intuitively, this means that such sequences
F
n
must occupy an ever-widening ‘wedge’ in
2
X
n
: the further
F
n
climbs up
2
X
n
in one area, the further it must spread down and across
2
X
n
in another. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 |
ISSN: | 1029-242X 1025-5834 1029-242X |
DOI: | 10.1186/s13660-025-03272-z |