Unintended consequences of using collars with occipital extensions in neck support – Snapshot assessment at the largest tertiary spinal referral centre in the UK

• Published in: International journal of orthopaedic and trauma nursing Vol. 53; p. 101083
• Main Authors: Patel, N., Rajabian, A., George, J.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Elsevier Ltd 01.05.2024
• Subjects: Aspen collar; Cervical fractures; Hard-collar; Odontoid fractures; Spinal collar care; Aspen collar; Cervical fractures; Spinal collar care; Hard-collar; Odontoid fractures
• ISSN: 1878-1241; 1878-1292
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ijotn.2024.101083

Upper cervical spine fractures are commonplace in the elderly following low energy trauma. These injuries carry high mortality rates, similar to patients sustaining hip fractures. A key aspect affecting clinical outcome is effective management in the first 12 weeks following injury. This study aims to assess the understanding of healthcare staff that may be required to care for such patients. A survey was carried out over a single day at the UK's largest Spine Specialist referral centre (Salford Royal Foundation Trust, SRFT) assessing the understanding of healthcare staff of the term, ‘Collar with occipital extension’, by asking staff to identify the safe position of the neck when looking at clinical images of a model in a collar in various different neck positions. The participants demographics were then taken, including profession, grade, spinal/post graduate experience, if English is their first language and their understanding of the term ‘Collar with occipital extension’. 102 participants were interviewed and the results showed almost half (45.1%) of participants selecting an incorrect hyperextended neck to be a safe position for conservative treatment and only 37.3% selecting the neutral position as satisfactory. The only positive predictors identified for those selective the neutral safe cervical spine alignment was if participants had >5 years of previous spinal experience (p = 0.0006) or if they understood the term ‘Collar with occipital extension’ to be describing the collar component (p = 0.000013) and not neck position. Management of spinal injuries are classically poorly managed in non-spinal centres, possibly due to the lack of training and understanding within the spinal speciality. This study shows the importance of clearly communicating with referring hospitals exactly how to conservatively manage patients with high cervical injuries to best improve clinical outcome.