Beyond gender: Exploring sexual orientation, race and motivations among Brazilian flexitarians

In this study, we analyzed 989 Brazilian individuals identified as flexitarians to explore the relationship between gender, sexual orientation, and meat consumption reduction behavior, while evaluating the impact of motivations driving individuals towards this dietary model. To achieve this goal, we...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAppetite Vol. 199; p. 107396
Main Authors Teixeira, Carla Djaine, Gomes, Sávio Marcelino, Medeiros Jacob, Michelle Cristine
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Elsevier Ltd 01.08.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In this study, we analyzed 989 Brazilian individuals identified as flexitarians to explore the relationship between gender, sexual orientation, and meat consumption reduction behavior, while evaluating the impact of motivations driving individuals towards this dietary model. To achieve this goal, we tested the following hypotheses: women consume less meat than men; LGBT women consume less meat than heterosexual women; LGBT men consume less meat than heterosexual men; and women are more motivated by the environmental impact of meat. Our findings revealed that although gender significantly influences motivations, with women showing a greater influence from animal ethics, flexitarians of both genders exhibit similar meat consumption patterns. Neither sexual orientation nor gender influence meat reduction patterns among flexitarians. However, the race/ethnicity of white individuals is a predominant factor among those who reduce meat consumption the most. Consequently, we conclude that (i) the social theories applied to explain gender differences in meat exclusion behavior may not be the most suitable for explaining meat reduction behavior, and (ii) intersectional approaches are needed to investigate flexitarianism.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0195-6663
1095-8304
DOI:10.1016/j.appet.2024.107396