Development of a Tool to Assess Surgical Resident Competence On-Call: The Western University Call Assessment Tool (WUCAT)

• Published in: Journal of surgical education Vol. 81; no. 1; pp. 106 - 114
• Main Authors: Mitchell, Eric C, Ott, Michael, Ross, Douglas, Grant, Aaron
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01.01.2024
• Subjects: Clinical Competence; Education, Medical, Graduate - methods; Educational Measurement - methods; Humans; Internship and Residency; Interpersonal and Communication; Medical Knowledge; Patient Care; Practice-Based Learning and Improvement; Reproducibility of Results; Universities; competency-based medical education; assessment; autonomy; Patient Care; Interpersonal and Communication; Medical Knowledge; Practice-Based Learning and Improvement; on-call; Post-graduate medical education; workplace-based assessment
• ISSN: 1931-7204; 1878-7452
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2023.10.001

•Residents spend a significant portion of training on-call.•Assessment and feedback is an important feature of postgraduate training.•Nominal group technique was used to define the construct of competence on-call.•A modern validity framework was used to collect validity evidence for our tool.•The novel on-call assessment tool can provide valuable feedback to residents. A central tenet of competency-based medical education is the formative assessment of trainees. There are currently no assessments designed to examine resident competence on-call, despite the on-call period being a significant component of residency, characterized by less direct supervision compared to daytime. The purpose of this study was to design a formative on-call assessment tool and collect valid evidence on its application. Nominal group technique was used to identify critical elements of surgical resident competence on-call to inform tool development. The tool was piloted over six months in the Division of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery at our institution. Quantitative and qualitative evidence was collected to examine tool validity. A ten-item tool was developed based on the consensus group results. Sixty-three assessments were completed by seven staff members on ten residents during the pilot. The tool had a reliability coefficient of 0.67 based on a generalizability study and internal item consistency was 0.92. Scores were significantly associated with years of training. We found the tool improved the quantity and structure of feedback given and that the tool was considered feasible and acceptable by both residents and staff members. The Western University Call Assessment Tool (WUCAT) has multiple sources of evidence supporting its use in assessing resident competence on-call.