Seismic fragility analysis of shield tunnels in liquefiable layered deposits
Ensuring the structural resilience of shield tunnels is critical in seismically active regions. Liquefaction induced by seismic activity poses an additional hazard to tunnel safety. The study performed seismic fragility analysis using the incremental dynamic analysis method which utilized a finite e...
Saved in:
Published in | Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering (1984) Vol. 191; p. 109246 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Elsevier Ltd
01.04.2025
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0267-7261 |
DOI | 10.1016/j.soildyn.2025.109246 |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Ensuring the structural resilience of shield tunnels is critical in seismically active regions. Liquefaction induced by seismic activity poses an additional hazard to tunnel safety. The study performed seismic fragility analysis using the incremental dynamic analysis method which utilized a finite element model of a saturated porous seabed shield tunnel. The findings highlighted that different liquefaction mechanisms are observed in different types of the soil surrounding the tunnel. The thickness of the fine sand layer (FSL) surrounding the tunnel significantly affects seabed liquefaction depth and the tunnel's maximum bending moment (Mmax). The highest Mmax and damage probabilities were observed when the tunnel was entirely embedded in the FSL, whereas the smallest Mmax and lowest damage probabilities occurred when the tunnel was partially within the sand and clay. This study could also provide some insights on seismic mitigation strategies in subsea shield tunnels and the soil type influences the timing of Mmax occurrence and emphasized the critical role of seismic frequency in determining the tunnel's response.
•The failure probability was evaluated for subsea tunnels in liquefiable layered seabed.•The influence of soil properties around the tunnel on seismic vulnerability is analyzed.•The fine sand thickness significantly affects the location, timing of Mmax, and tunnel fragility.•Low-frequency earthquakes cause larger Mmax in tunnel, leading to greater damage. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0267-7261 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.soildyn.2025.109246 |