Impact of an e-learning training for interpreting intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring to avoid perinatal asphyxia: A before-after multicenter observational study

• Published in: Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction Vol. 53; no. 3; p. 102736
• Main Authors: Slaoui, Aziz, Cordier, Cécile, Lefevre-Morane, Emilie, Tessier, Véronique, Goffinet, François, Le Ray, Camille, Bourgeois-Moine, Agnès, Sibiude, Jeanne, Laurent, Anne-Charlotte, Azria, Elie
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: France Elsevier Masson SAS 01.03.2024
• Subjects: Asphyxia; Avoidability; Cardiotocography; Computer-Assisted Instruction; e-learning; Female; Heart Rate Determination; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Labor management; Learning; Neonatal morbidity; Perinatal asphyxia; Placenta; Pregnancy; DHU; Perinatal asphyxia; CPP; Avoidability; e-learning; Cardiotocography; Labor management; CTG; CNGOF; Neonatal morbidity; LÖF
• ISSN: 2468-7847; 2468-7847
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2024.102736

Perinatal asphyxia, a condition that results from compromised placental or pulmonary gas exchange during the birth process, is rare but can lead to serious neonatal and long-term consequences. The visual analysis of cardiotocography (CTG) is designed to avoid perinatal asphyxia, but its interpretation can be difficult. Our aim was to test the impact of an e-learning training program for interpreting CTG on the rate of avoidable perinatal asphyxia at term. We conducted a retrospective multicenter before-after study comparing two periods, before and after the implementation of e-learning training program from July 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016, in CTG interpretation for midwives and obstetricians in five maternity hospitals in the Paris area, France. The training involved theoretical aspects such as fetal physiology and heart rhythm abnormalities, followed by practical exercises using real case studies to enhance skills in interpreting CTG. We included all term births that occurred between the “before” period (July 1 to December 31, 2014) and the “after period (January 1 to June 30, 2017). We excluded multiple pregnancies, antenatal detection of congenital abnormalities, breech births and all scheduled caesarean sections. Perinatal asphyxia cases were analyzed by a pair of experts consisting of midwives and obstetricians, and avoidability of perinatal asphyxia was estimated. The main criterion was the prevalence of avoidable perinatal asphyxia. The e-learning program was performed by 83 % of the obstetrician-gynecologists and 65 % of the midwives working in the delivery rooms of the five centers. The prevalence of perinatal asphyxia was 0.45 % (29/7902 births) before the training and 0.54 % (35/7722) after. The rate of perinatal asphyxia rated as avoidable was 0.30 % of live births before the training and 0.28 % after (p = 0.870). The main causes of perinatal asphyxia deemed avoidable were delay in reactions to severe CTG anomalies and errors in the analysis and interpretation of the CTG. These causes did not differ between the two periods. One session of e-learning training to analyze CTG was not associated with a reduction in avoidable perinatal asphyxia. Other types of e-learning, repeated and implemented over a longer period should be evaluated.