Outcomes in facial transplantation – a systematic review

• Published in: British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery Vol. 62; no. 5; pp. 404 - 414
• Main Authors: Hadjiandreou, Michalis, Pafitanis, Georgios, Butler, Peter M.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Scotland Elsevier Ltd 01.06.2024
• Subjects: Allotransplantation; Esthetics; Face; Facial burns; Facial Transplantation; Facial trauma; Graft Survival; Humans; Postoperative Complications; Quality of Life; Reconstruction; Reconstructive transplantation; Transplant; Treatment Outcome; Vascular composite allograft; Vascular composite allograft; Reconstruction; Facial trauma; Reconstructive transplantation; Allotransplantation; Face; Facial burns; Transplant
• ISSN: 0266-4356; 1532-1940
• DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2024.02.008

Facial transplantations have become a clinical reality as the last reconstructive option in severely disfigured patients. To date, clinical outcomes remain unclear. The purpose of this paper was to analyse the outcomes in facial transplantation (FT) and determine the risks and benefits of FT based on short- and long-term outcomes. An electronic literature search was performed across PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases to capture all the relevant records relating to outcomes in FTs from 2005 to 2021. Articles for inclusion were decided upon pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. A total of 48 FTs has been performed to date. A total of 90 studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in the outcome analysis. Studies were analysed based on each of the 48 cases and outcomes categorised into short-term (<36 months) and long-term (>36 months) outcomes. Primary outcomes included patient and graft survival and secondary outcomes included functional, surgical revision events, immunological, medical complications, aesthetics, psychosocial and quality of life. Mortality rate, infection and malignancy incidence remain high, and patients should be fully informed of the potential life-threatening complications. FTs improve outcomes such as quality of life and psychosocial recovery in the short- and long-term. Outcomes remain under-reported in peer-review journals.