A pilot project to encourage scientific debate in schools. Comics written and peer reviewed by young learners

Comprehension of the nature and practice of science and its social context are important aspects of communicating and learning science. However there is still very little understanding amongt the non-scientific community of the need for debate in driving scientific knowledge forward and the role of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of science communication Vol. 10; no. 3; p. A04
Main Authors Lo Iacono, Giovanni, de Paula, Adélia S.A.T.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Sissa Medialab srl / Scuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati 01.09.2011
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Comprehension of the nature and practice of science and its social context are important aspects of communicating and learning science. However there is still very little understanding amongt the non-scientific community of the need for debate in driving scientific knowledge forward and the role of critical scrutiny in quality control. Peer review is an essential part of this process. We initiated and developed a pilot project to provide an opportunity for students to explore the idea that science is a dynamic process rather than a static body of facts. Students from two different schools experienced the process of peer-review by producing and reviewing comics related to the science done at Rothamsted Research. As authors, students showed a large degree of creativity and understanding of the science while as referees they showed good critical skills. Students had at first hand an insight into how science works.
ISSN:1824-2049
1824-2049
DOI:10.22323/2.10030204