Three branches of literary anthropology: Sources, styles, subject matter

‘What is literary anthropology?’ – a deceptively simple question, posed by anthropologist Paul Stoller – unleashes debate about the perceived identity of the field. Through the lens of three book reviews, this essay proposes conceptualizing literary anthropology as a central stem with three branches...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEthnography Vol. 21; no. 2; pp. 280 - 295
Main Author Wiles, Ellen
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London, England SAGE Publications 01.06.2020
Sage Publications Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:‘What is literary anthropology?’ – a deceptively simple question, posed by anthropologist Paul Stoller – unleashes debate about the perceived identity of the field. Through the lens of three book reviews, this essay proposes conceptualizing literary anthropology as a central stem with three branches. The first is the use of literary texts as ethnographic source material, particularly for historical anthropologists. The second is the use of literary modes of writing ethnography, ranging from the incorporation of metaphorical language and the subversion of conventional ethnographic structures to the production of fiction as ethnography. The third is the anthropological examination of literary cultural and production practices. The third has been underexplored in the academy to date, the second has been at the centre of fierce controversy within the wider field of anthropology, while the first has arguably been limited by restrictive disciplinary and epistemological assumptions.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:1466-1381
1741-2714
DOI:10.1177/1466138118762958