Health actions prompted by health assessments for people with intellectual disability exceed actions recorded in general practitioners' records

• Published in: Australian journal of primary health Vol. 21; no. 3; pp. 317 - 320
• Main Authors: Byrne, Jacqueline H, Ware, Robert S, Lennox, Nicholas G
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Australia CSIRO 2015
• Subjects: Action; Assessment; Confidence intervals; Diaries; Disability; Disability Evaluation; Disabled Persons; Funding; General Practice; General practitioners; Health needs; Health risk assessment; Health Status; Hearing; Hearing tests; Humans; Intellectual disabilities; Intellectual Disability; Intervention; Learning disabilities; Learning disabled people; Medical records; Personal health; Practice Patterns, Physicians' - statistics & numerical data; Preventive Health Services; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk assessment; Short term; Software; Studies; Unmet needs; Womens health; Queensland Australia
• ISSN: 1448-7527; 1836-7399
• DOI: 10.1071/PY14007

People with intellectual disability experience inadequate health care and have unmet health needs that can go unidentified or be poorly managed. Health assessments have been shown to significantly increase short-term clinical activity for people with intellectual disability. The aim of this study was to more accurately quantify the effect of health assessments for people with intellectual disability by comparing health actions recorded in health assessment booklets to actions recorded in general practitioners' (GPs) records in the 12-month period following the health assessment. Participants were people with intellectual disability who had received a Comprehensive Health Assessment Program (CHAP), living in the community. The CHAP is a health assessment that is demonstrated to significantly increase health actions, compared with usual care, for people with intellectual disability. Data collected from three randomised controlled trials conducted in South-East Queensland, Australia, from 2000 to 2010 were pooled and analysed. The health assessment booklet contained significantly more information on health actions than GPs' records. Notably, hearing tests (risk ratio (RR) = 5.9; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 4.7-7.4), breast checks (RR = 3.9; 95% CI = 2.7-5.7), and skin examinations (RR = 7.9; 95% CI = 5.9-10.7) were more likely to be recorded in the CHAP booklet. Health assessments increase health actions for people with intellectual disability to a significantly greater extent than previously demonstrated.