Punishing Fieldwork: Penal Domination and Prison Ethnography

• Published in: Journal of contemporary ethnography Vol. 49; no. 5; pp. 666 - 690
• Main Authors: Gibson-Light, Michael, Seim, Josh
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Los Angeles, CA SAGE Publications 01.10.2020; SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC
• Subjects: Access; Dominance; Ethnographers; Ethnography; Fatigue; Field study; Fieldwork; Human dignity; Imprisonment; Power; Prisoners; Prisons; Qualitative research; Researcher subject relations; prison research; in-depth interviews; prison; participant observation; ethnography
• ISSN: 0891-2416; 1552-5414
• DOI: 10.1177/0891241620932982

Ethnographic studies inside prisons are especially difficult to execute. In addition to facing amplified challenges in gaining site access, earning subjects’ trust, and tolerating the exhaustion of fieldwork, researchers who collect participant observation and in-depth interview data behind bars must confront an explicit asymmetrical power relation. Prison ethnographers penetrate, to varying levels of depth, a social universe where staff dominate prisoners and where prisoners, largely in response to the pains of their imprisonment, carve paths to dignity. This paper considers how and where non-staff and non-incarcerated ethnographers can awkwardly fit into (or fail out of) this space. Drawing on insights from two ethnographic studies in the United States, the authors detail their particular and common experiences across three phases: access, collection, and exit. These experiences motivate a description of prison ethnography as “punishing fieldwork.” Such research is not only exacting, it is also significantly contained and directed by penal power.