Efficacy and Safety of Insulin Degludec/Insulin Aspart versus Biphasic Insulin Aspart 30 in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

• Published in: Iranian journal of public health Vol. 53; no. 2; pp. 313 - 322
• Main Authors: Niu, Yan-Li, Zhang, Ye, Song, Zhi-Yong, Zhao, Chuan-Zhi, Luo, Yun, Wang, Yan, Yuan, Jing
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Iran Tehran University of Medical Sciences 01.02.2024
• Subjects: Review; Biphasic insulin aspart 30; Type 2 diabetes; Effectiveness; Randomised controlled trials; Insulin aspart; Insulin degludec; Meta-analysis
• ISSN: 2251-6085; 2251-6093; 2251-6093
• DOI: 10.18502/ijph.v53i2.14916

We systematically reviewed and analyzed the efficacy and safety of insulin degludec/insulin as-part (IDegAsp) versus biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp 30) in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). We used computers to search the Embase, PubMed, Clinical Trials, and the Cochrane Library database, and collected randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the treatment of IDegAsp versus BIAsp 30 in T2D patients. The research period was from the establishment of the database to May 19, 2023. We used Review Manager 5.20 statistical software for systematic meta-analysis. We included 8 RCTs with 2281 participants. IDegAsp was better to BIAsp30 in improving fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels ( <0.001) and reducing the endpoint daily average insulin dose ( <0.01). Furthermore, compared with BIAsp30, IDegAsp significantly reduced the risk of nocturnal hypoglycemic events ( <0.001). However, there was no significant difference in the improvement of body weight change ( =0.99), glycosylated hemoglobin ( =0.50), the overall risk of hypoglycemic events ( =0.57) and adverse events ( =0.89) between the two groups. Compared with BIAsp30, IDegAsp could significantly reduce FPG levels, insulin dosage, and the risk of nocturnal hypoglycemic events in T2D patients, without increasing the overall risk of adverse events.