‘This is exactly how the Nazis ran it’: (De)legitimising the EU on Wikipedia

This article addresses how the Wikipedia community has grappled with controversial elements of the European Union’s (EU) history from 2001 to 2019. It also examines what perspective on the EU the Wikipedia editors develop in debates about the institution’s history and if/how the community has (de)le...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inDiscourse & society Vol. 31; no. 4; pp. 411 - 427
Main Author Kopf, Susanne
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London, England SAGE Publications 01.07.2020
Sage Publications Ltd
Subjects
Argumentation
Community
Computer mediated communication
Corpus analysis
Creation process
Information sources
Internet
Legitimacy
Linguistics
Nazism
Systemic functional linguistics
Argumentation analysis
online debates
European Union
legitimacy
legitimation
history of the European Union
Wikipedia
corpus-assisted discourse studies
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:This article addresses how the Wikipedia community has grappled with controversial elements of the European Union’s (EU) history from 2001 to 2019. It also examines what perspective on the EU the Wikipedia editors develop in debates about the institution’s history and if/how the community has (de)legitimised the EU’s existence today in the context of discussions about the EU’s predecessors. The data examined consist of Wikipedia contributors’ debates that took place on a Wikipedia discussion site (‘talk page’). Taking a corpus-assisted approach combined with argumentation analysis and aspects of systemic functional linguistics, I found that Wikipedia editors repeatedly propose that Nazi Germany might have been a precursor of the EU today. However, the Wikipedia community ultimately rejects this notion and emphasises the voluntary nature guiding the EU’s creation process. Thus, while the EU’s legitimacy is indeed contested in the course of the debates, the Wikipedia community eventually rejects this challenge.
ISSN:0957-9265
1460-3624
DOI:10.1177/0957926520903524