Finding the Exhaustive List of Small Fully Absorbing Sets and Designing the Corresponding Low Error-Floor Decoder

This work provides an efficient exhaustive search algorithm for finding all small fully absorbing sets (FASs) of any arbitrary low-density parity-check (LDPC) code. The proposed algorithm is based on the branch-&-bound principle for solving NP-complete problems. In particular, given any LDPC cod...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inIEEE transactions on communications Vol. 60; no. 6; pp. 1487 - 1498
Main Authors Gyu Bum Kyung, Chih-Chun Wang
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY IEEE 01.06.2012
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This work provides an efficient exhaustive search algorithm for finding all small fully absorbing sets (FASs) of any arbitrary low-density parity-check (LDPC) code. The proposed algorithm is based on the branch-&-bound principle for solving NP-complete problems. In particular, given any LDPC code, the problem of finding all FASs of size less than t is formulated as an integer programming problem, for which a new branch-&-bound algorithm is devised with new node selection and tree-trimming mechanisms. The resulting algorithm is capable of finding all FASs of size <; 7 for LDPC codes of length <; 1000. When limiting the FASs of interest to those with the number of violated parity-check nodes <; 3, the proposed algorithm is capable of finding all such FASs of size <; 14 for LDPC codes of lengths <; 1000. The resulting exhaustive list of small FASs is then used to devise a new efficient post-processing low-error floor LDPC decoder. The numerical results show that by exploiting the exhaustive list of small FASs, the proposed post-processing decoder can significantly lower the error-floor performance of a given LDPC code. For various example codes of length <; 3000, the proposed post-processing decoder lowers the error floor by a couple of orders of magnitude when compared to the standard belief propagation decoder and by an order of magnitude when compared to other existing low error-floor decoders.
ISSN:0090-6778
1558-0857
DOI:10.1109/TCOMM.2012.042712.100672