Experimental study and numerical verification of silted-up dam break

• Published in: Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam) Vol. 590; p. 125267
• Main Authors: Vosoughi, Foad, Rakhshandehroo, Gholamreza, Nikoo, Mohammad Reza, Sadegh, Mojtaba
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier B.V 01.11.2020
• Subjects: Dam break; Image processing; Multiphase flood wave; OpenFOAM; Silted-up reservoirs; Silted-up reservoirs; OpenFOAM; Dam break; Multiphase flood wave; Image processing
• ISSN: 0022-1694; 1879-2707
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125267

[Display omitted] •Experimental silted-up dam break with different up- and down-stream conditions.•Wide range of data collected could be utilized for validation of numerical studies.•Numerical modeling of silted-up dam break: various up- and down-stream conditions.•Simulations of three-phase flows via VOF and Eulerian methods using OpenFOAM.•Experimental and numerical results are compared quantitatively and visually. In this study, multiphase flood waves caused by failure of silted-up dams have been scrutinized experimentally, and efficacy of the public-domain CFD software OpenFOAM numerical models to represent such phenomenon is evaluated. Experimental observations are sparse on dam break for reservoirs with high sediment depths, called silted-up reservoirs. Sediment layer, in this case, may behave as a viscous fluid and produce a complex multi-layer flow of air and water overtopping a sediment layer. Massive sediment quantities can have a substantial impact on the wave propagation pattern caused by dam break. This study contributes to an experiment-based understanding of dam break phenomenon with silted-up reservoir, and elaborates the propagation of multi-layer waves. Herein, different hydraulic conditions were experimentally observed including 8 different upstream sediment depths in the range of 0–0.24 m and 4 downstream initial water levels of 0, 0.02, 0.04 and 0.05 m, which collectively created 32 scenarios. The resulted waves were filmed by high-speed cameras and data were extracted through image processing. An open-source CFD software, namely OpenFOAM, was employed to simulate the experiments using two distinct numerical approaches: volume of fluid (VOF) and Eulerian. Results of both numerical approaches were in good agreement with the experimental measurements; with MAE and RMSE error values varying from 0.006 m to 0.031 m and 0.008 m to 0.043 m, respectively (2% to 10% and 2.6% to 14% with respect to the reservoir height of 0.3 m). The Eulerian approach showed marginally superior performance to VOF, especially in cases with high sediment depths, which is likely due to accommodating phase mixing. A wide collection of high-quality data is made available online in the Appendix Data and could be utilized in future studies.