Alternatives for the biomonitoring of fish and phytoplankton in tropical streams

Biomonitoring programs need to balance accurate responses in assessments of changes in biological communities with sampling that is fast and low cost. In this study, we evaluated the concordance among fish and phytoplankton communities of streams. We tested the cross-taxa surrogacy, taxonomic, numer...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNeotropical biology and conservation Vol. 14; no. 4; pp. 361 - 380
Main Authors de Oliveira Barbosa, Hugo, Borges Machado, Karine, Carvalho Vieira, Maisa, Rodrigo Pereira, Hasley, Fernandes Gomes, Leonardo, Carlos Nabout, João, Barreto Teresa, Fabrício, Vieira, Ludgero Cardoso Galli
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Sophia Pensoft Publishers 01.11.2019
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Biomonitoring programs need to balance accurate responses in assessments of changes in biological communities with sampling that is fast and low cost. In this study, we evaluated the concordance among fish and phytoplankton communities of streams. We tested the cross-taxa surrogacy, taxonomic, numerical resolution and ecological substitute group (habitat use and trophic guilds) resolution with Procrustes analyses aim of simplifying the biomonitoring process. We collect a total fish abundance of 8,461 individuals, represented by the ecological classes of habitat, including benthic, nektonic, nektobenthic, marginal and trophic guilds by detritivore, terrestrial invertivore, aquatic invertivore, piscivore, algivore and herbivore. We sampled a phytoplankton total density of 1,466.68 individuals/ml, represented by four Morphology-Based Functional Groups and nine Reynolds Functional Groups. Our results don’t support the use of substitute groups among fish and phytoplankton. For fish, habitat use and trophic guild are good surrogates for species-level data. Additionally, our results don’t support the use of functional groups as surrogates for phytoplankton. We suggest the use of higher taxonomic levels (genus and family) and record only the occurrence of species and/or genus for fish and phytoplankton. Our findings contribute to decreasing the costs and time of biomonitoring programs assessments and/or conservation plans on fish and phytoplankton communities of headwater streams.
ISSN:2236-3777
1809-9939
2236-3777
DOI:10.3897/neotropical.14.e38088