A clinical evaluation of an alternating-pressure mattress replacement system in hospital and residential care settings

• Published in: Journal of tissue viability Vol. 10; no. 1; pp. 6 - 11
• Main Authors: Land, Lucy, Evans, Debra, Geary, Amanda, Taylor, Carl
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Elsevier Ltd 01.01.2000
• Subjects: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; APACHE; Beds - standards; Female; Hospitalization; Humans; Male; Nursing; Nursing Assessment; Nursing Homes; Pressure Ulcer - nursing; Pressure Ulcer - physiopathology; Pressure Ulcer - prevention & control; Severity of Illness Index; Wound Healing
• ISSN: 0965-206X
• DOI: 10.1016/S0965-206X(00)80014-5

An observational study was carried out to compare wound healing on alternating-pressure mattress replacement systems (APMRS) and other surfaces in an elderly population in acute and residential care settings. Subjects were assessed for the reduction in their pressure ulcers at approximately two weeks and per day, and a visual analogue scale was used to record the patients' comfort. Seven and ten subjects were allocated to the Nimbus III APMRS (Huntleigh Healthcare Ltd) in the hospital and residential care settings respectively. There was no significant difference in the healing of the subjects' sores in the two areas either at two weeks or per day. Five people were allocated to control surfaces in the hospital setting (mainly APMRS; Pegasus Airwave, Pegasus Egerton) and ten in the residential care setting (mainly alternating-pressure overlays; AlphaXcell, Huntleigh Healthcare Ltd). There was no significant difference in the healing of subjects' sores in the two areas, either at two weeks or per day. The trial APMRS was found to be equally comfortable in either setting, and in both settings the control surfaces were not regarded as significantly different in terms of comfort. These findings, from a small sample, promote discussion about the use of pressure-relieving equipment in settings where there are older people who may be at particular risk from pressure damage and where nursing interventions are less intensive and routine.