The morpho-kinematics of the circumstellar envelope around the AGB star EP Aqr
ABSTRACT ALMA observations of CO(1–0) and CO(2–1) emissions of the circumstellar envelope of EP Aqr, an oxygen-rich asymptotic giant branch star, are reported. A thorough analysis of their properties is presented using an original method based on the separation of the data cube into a low-velocity c...
Saved in:
Published in | Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Vol. 484; no. 2; pp. 1865 - 1888 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Oxford University Press (OUP): Policy P - Oxford Open Option A
01.04.2019
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | ABSTRACT
ALMA observations of CO(1–0) and CO(2–1) emissions of the circumstellar envelope of EP Aqr, an oxygen-rich asymptotic giant branch star, are reported. A thorough analysis of their properties is presented using an original method based on the separation of the data cube into a low-velocity component associated with an equatorial outflow and a faster component associated with a bipolar outflow. A number of important and new results are obtained concerning the distribution in space of the effective emissivity, the temperature, the density, and the flux of matter. A mass-loss rate of (1.6 ± 0.4)×10−7 solar masses per year is measured. The main parameters defining the morphology and kinematics of the envelope are evaluated and uncertainties inherent to de-projection are critically discussed. Detailed properties of the equatorial region of the envelope are presented including a measurement of the line width and a precise description of the observed inhomogeneity of both morphology and kinematics. In particular, in addition to the presence of a previously observed spiral enhancement of the morphology at very small Doppler velocities, a similarly significant but uncorrelated circular enhancement of the expansion velocity is revealed, both close to the limit of sensitivity. The results of the analysis place significant constraints on the parameters of models proposing descriptions of the mass-loss mechanism, but cannot choose among them with confidence. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0035-8711 1365-2966 |
DOI: | 10.1093/mnras/stz041 |