Comparative efficacy of carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone ( KRd ) versus bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone ( VRd ) in newly‐diagnosed multiple myeloma: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
In view of the increasing data evaluating carfilzomib-based induction for newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM), we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the efficacy of carfilzomib/lenalidomide/dexamethasone (KRd) versus bortezomib/lenalidomide/dexamethasone (VRd). Three studi...
Saved in:
Published in | American journal of hematology Vol. 99; no. 7; pp. 1411 - 1414 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
01.07.2024
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | In view of the increasing data evaluating carfilzomib-based induction for newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM), we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the efficacy of carfilzomib/lenalidomide/dexamethasone (KRd) versus bortezomib/lenalidomide/dexamethasone (VRd). Three studies totaling 1597 patients (50% KRd-treated, 50% VRd-treated) were included. Despite similar survival outcomes and overall response rate compared with the VRd arm, KRd-treated subjects showed higher odds of achieving complete responses and measurable residual disease negativity. Among patients with high-risk cytogenetics (n = 348), KRd was associated with significant improvement in progression-free survival (HR = 0.70; 95% CI = 0.50-0.97; p = .03; I
= 0%), suggesting carfilzomib-based induction may be preferable in this NDMM subpopulation. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 ObjectType-Correspondence-4 ObjectType-Undefined-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-3 |
ISSN: | 0361-8609 1096-8652 1096-8652 |
DOI: | 10.1002/ajh.27314 |