Shaping ability of a pediatric motor-driven instrumentation system in primary molar root canal prototypes

Evaluate the shaping ability and preparation time using a pediatric motor-driven rotary instrumentation compared to other systems in resin prototypes of primary molars. Thirty specimens were scanned in micro-CT and divided into three groups according to the instrumentation type: pediatric motor-driv...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBrazilian dental journal Vol. 34; no. 5; pp. 36 - 42
Main Authors Souza, Bianca Katsumata de, Alcalde, Murilo Priori, Duarte, Marco Antonio Hungaro, Machado, Maria Aparecida Andrade Moreira, Oliveira, Thais Marchini, Lourenço Neto, Natalino
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Brazil Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto 2023
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Evaluate the shaping ability and preparation time using a pediatric motor-driven rotary instrumentation compared to other systems in resin prototypes of primary molars. Thirty specimens were scanned in micro-CT and divided into three groups according to the instrumentation type: pediatric motor-driven Sequence baby File (SBF); conventional motor-driven (Sequence Rotary File - SRF); manual K file. Instrumentation time was timed. After preparation, the specimens were scanned again. The pre- and post-instrumentation images were superimposed to measure the amount of root canal deviation and the resin remnant thickness. ANOVA followed by the Tukey test analyzed the comparisons between groups (p<0.05). No statistically significant differences occurred in root canal deviation among groups (p>0.05). There were statistically significant differences in the comparison among root thirds (p<0.001) but without significant differences in the interaction group vs. root third (p>0.05). Both motor-driven instrumentations showed statistically greater weariness than manual instrumentation (p<0.001), without significant significant differences between SBF and SRF. Motor-driven instrumentation had a shorter working time than manual instrumentation (p<0.001). Pediatric motor-driven instrumentation demonstrated good outcomes in relation to root canal deviation and amount of remnant structure, with shorter instrumentation time. SBF can be a suitable alternative for endodontic instrumentation in primary molars.
ISSN:0103-6440
1806-4760
DOI:10.1590/0103-6440202305372