Keyhole Versus Sugarbaker Mesh Configuration in Parastomal Hernia Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

• Published in: Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy & percutaneous techniques Vol. 33; no. 5; p. 556
• Main Authors: Mazzola Poli de Figueiredo, Sergio, Rodrigues, Amanda Cyntia Lima Fonseca, de Araújo, Sérgio Walmir, Mao, Rui-Min Diana, Villasante-Tezanos, Alejandro, Tastaldi, Luciano, Lu, Richard
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 01.10.2023
• Subjects: Hernia, Ventral - surgery; Herniorrhaphy - adverse effects; Herniorrhaphy - instrumentation; Herniorrhaphy - methods; Humans; Incisional Hernia - etiology; Incisional Hernia - surgery; Laparoscopy - adverse effects; Laparoscopy - methods; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology; Postoperative Complications - etiology; Surgical Mesh; Surgical Stomas - adverse effects; Treatment Outcome
• ISSN: 1534-4908
• DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000001203

Parastomal hernia repairs (PHRs) are often complex and challenging, even for experienced abdominal wall surgeons. Although the ideal therapeutic option in the setting of a parastomal hernia is to restore intestinal continuity, this is often not feasible, and numerous techniques have been described for PHR. Current guidelines recommend using mesh for elective PHR, but there is a scarcity of evidence comparing different PHR techniques. We aimed to report a meta-analysis comparing the outcomes of the "Sugarbaker" and "Keyhole" mesh configuration in PHR. A literature search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases was performed to identify studies comparing Sugarbaker and Keyhole mesh configuration in PHR. Postoperative outcomes were assessed by means of pooled analysis and meta-analysis. Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4. Heterogeneity was assessed with I2 statistics. A total of 3247 studies were screened, and 27 were fully reviewed. Ten studies and 632 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Three hundred five patients (48.3%) with Keyhole and 327 patients (51.7%) with Sugarbaker mesh configuration. Four hundred thirty-three patients (68.5%) underwent laparoscopic PHR with intraperitoneal onlay mesh. Sugarbaker mesh configuration was associated with lower hernia recurrence compared with Keyhole (odds ratio: 0.39; 95% CI: 0.19-0.83; P = 0.01; I2 = 46%). No differences were seen in overall complications, reoperations, stoma outlet obstruction, mesh infection, and postoperative bleeding. PHR with Sugarbaker mesh configuration is associated with decreased hernia recurrence compared with Keyhole and had similar rates of overall complications, reoperations, stoma outlet obstruction, mesh infection, and postoperative bleeding.