Evaluation of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from donkeys using four different cytological stains: A pilot study

• Published in: Journal of equine veterinary science Vol. 135; p. 105035
• Main Authors: Vitale, V., Bindi, F., Briganti, A., Bonelli, F., Parietti, C., Sgorbini, M.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01.04.2024
• Subjects: Animals; Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid; Coloring Agents; Differential cell count; Donkey; Equidae; Female; Horses; Humans; Pilot Projects; Staining; Staining and Labeling - veterinary; Tolonium Chloride; Differential cell count; Staining; Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid; Donkey
• ISSN: 0737-0806; 1542-7412
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jevs.2024.105035

•Diff-Quick did not correctly identify mast cells.•Modified May-Grunwald Giemsa and Toluidine Blue identified mast cells.•Perls Prussion Blue was not superior in assessing hemosiderophages. Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) cytology is used for the diagnosis of non-infectious lower airway inflammation in equids. Discrepancies have been reported in the differential cell count when different staining methods were used both in humans and horses. The objective of this study was to compare the results of BALF cytology in donkeys using four different staining methods: modified May-Grunwald Giemsa (mMGG), Diff-Quick (DQ), Toluidine blue (TB) and Perls Prussian blue (PPB). Nine healthy Amiata female donkeys were enrolled. The BAL procedure was performed as previously described and pairs of cytocentrifuged BALF slides were stained with each method. No differences between mMGG and DQ were found for macrophages, neutrophils, and eosinophils, while differences were found in mast cell count between DQ vs.TB, but not between mMGG vs. DQ or mMGG vs. TB. Finally, no differences were obtained in the differential count for hemosiderophages comparing mMGG, DQ and PPB. The mMGG appears to be an excellent stain for the identification of all possible cell types, including mast cells in the BALF of donkeys. DQ, if used alone, may lead to inappropriate identification of mast cells. These results are consistent with the literature on BALF staining methods in horses.