Torsion affects the calculation of DNA twisting number

The topological properties of DNA have long been a focal point in biophysics. In the 1970s, White proposed that the topology of closed DNA double helix follows White's formula: Lk=Wr+Tw. However, there has been controversy in the calculation of DNA twisting number, partly due to discrepancies i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBiochemical and biophysical research communications Vol. 710; p. 149856
Main Authors Yang, Huimin, Shi, Xuguang
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 28.05.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The topological properties of DNA have long been a focal point in biophysics. In the 1970s, White proposed that the topology of closed DNA double helix follows White's formula: Lk=Wr+Tw. However, there has been controversy in the calculation of DNA twisting number, partly due to discrepancies in the definition of torsion in differential geometry. In this paper, we delved into a detailed study of torsion, revealing that the calculation of DNA twisting number should use the curve's geodesic torsion. Furthermore, we found that the discrepancy in DNA twisting numbers calculated using different torsion is N. This study elucidated the impact of torsion on the calculation of DNA twisting numbers, aiming to resolve controversies in the calculation of DNA topology and provided accurate computational methods and theoretical foundations for related research. •Both as a spatial curve and as a curve lying on a surface, the DNA helix axis is taken into account during the calculation of the twisting number. The torsion derived from each perspective varies.•We have clarified that the torsion mentioned in Fuller's works should refer to the geodesic torsion of the surface where the DNA helix axis resides.•The twisting number computed from the torsion of a surface curve differs from that of a spatial curve by a specific numerical factor.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0006-291X
1090-2104
DOI:10.1016/j.bbrc.2024.149856